从自己的话开始, 补上会改变结果的材料和边界。看过第一版再提具体反馈, 把一次含糊请求改成能验收的交付。Start in your own words and add material and boundaries that change the result. Turn an ambiguous request into a checkable deliverable through specific feedback.
「帮我写好一点」之后, 你可能收到一封语气更正式、事实却更远的信。修订时最值得补的通常很具体:给谁看, 对方读完该知道什么, 哪些事实不能动, 你打算怎样使用它。After “make this better,” you may receive a more formal message that drifts further from the facts. The most useful additions are usually concrete: who will read it, what they should understand, which facts must stay fixed, and how you will use it.这一章沿用一个小任务, 从含糊的一句要求走到可以直接复制的邀请。你会留下初稿、明确的反馈和修订版, 看到它到底改了什么。案例中的人、地点和活动都是虚构的;最后也不会自动替你发送。This chapter follows one small task from a vague request to an invitation you can copy. Keep the first draft, specific feedback, and revision so the changes are visible. The people, place, and event are fictional, and nothing will be sent automatically.
— I
先决定对方读完要做什么Decide What the Reader Should Do.
练习材料只有这些:你想请四位朋友参加周六的旧书交换;暂拟 10 月 17 日 15:00–17:00, 在社区活动室, 场地还没确认;每人带最多三本书, 不用买新书;希望周三晚前知道谁有兴趣;语气轻松, 不公开邀请更多人。The exercise facts are simple: invite four friends to a used-book swap, provisionally on October 17 from 15:00 to 17:00 in a community room that is not yet confirmed. Each person may bring up to three books and need not buy any. You want expressions of interest by Wednesday evening. Keep the tone relaxed and do not make it a public invitation.先用你自己的话说一次目标:「我想问四个朋友有没有兴趣, 时间和场地都还不能当成最终通知。」这句比「你是顶级活动策划大师」更接近任务。此时交付物是询问意向的短消息, 不应变成一套活动运营方案。Say the goal in your own words: “I want to ask four friends whether they are interested; the time and venue are not final.” That gets closer to the task than assigning a grand expert persona. The deliverable is a short expression-of-interest message, not an event-management plan.当前官方提示建议也把重点放在结果、材料和必要边界, 并允许逐轮修改。1注 1Note 1OpenAI · Prompting。当前建议从成果、相关材料和重要边界出发, 看第一版后继续反馈;不要求固定提示词格式。核对于 2026-10-09。OpenAI · Prompting. Current guidance emphasizes the desired result, relevant material, important boundaries, and follow-up feedback, without requiring a fixed prompt formula. Checked on 2026-10-09.本章模板只是帮助你发现缺什么, 不是每条聊天都要填写的表单。简单任务一句话够用, 复杂任务才补上会改变结果的细节。Current official prompting guidance also emphasizes the result, useful material, and necessary boundaries, with iterative refinement.1注 1Note 1OpenAI · Prompting。当前建议从成果、相关材料和重要边界出发, 看第一版后继续反馈;不要求固定提示词格式。核对于 2026-10-09。OpenAI · Prompting. Current guidance emphasizes the desired result, relevant material, important boundaries, and follow-up feedback, without requiring a fixed prompt formula. Checked on 2026-10-09. The template helps identify gaps; it is not a form to complete for every message. One sentence can be enough for a small task, while larger tasks need details that would change the result.
— II
把事实、偏好和空白分开Separate Facts, Preferences, and Gaps.
材料类型Type of material
本例In this exercise
怎么处理How to handle it
已确定规则Confirmed rules
最多三本旧书, 不必购买, 只邀四位朋友。Up to three used books, no purchase needed, four invitees.
保留意思, 不擅自加报名费或公开链接。Preserve the meaning; add no fee or public sign-up link.
个人偏好Your preferences
像平时聊天, 简短, 不用宣传口号。Conversational, brief, without slogans.
可以给一句自己的旧消息作语气样本。Supply one previous message as a tone sample if useful.
尚未确定Unconfirmed details
日期时间暂拟, 活动室尚未确认。Date and time provisional; room unconfirmed.
明确说暂定, 或先问你;不能悄悄补齐。State that they are provisional or ask; do not silently fill them in.
对真实任务, 多花半分钟标出这三类材料, 往往比增加十句语气要求更值得。特别是「大概」「可能」「待回复」这些词, 很容易在一版漂亮的总结里丢掉。你应该检查确定性有没有被改写。For a real task, identifying these three categories can be more useful than adding ten tone instructions. Words such as “perhaps,” “provisional,” and “awaiting a reply” can disappear in a polished summary. Check whether uncertainty has been rewritten as certainty.
— III
缺信息时, 只问影响结果的问题Ask Only Questions That Change the Result.
提示词Prompt先澄清, 再出一版Clarify, then draft
我想把 <材料> 变成给 <读者> 的 <成果>, 对方读完应该 <知道或采取什么行动>。保留 <确定事实>, 语气 <偏好>。如果缺信息会改变内容, 最多先问我三个问题;不重要的空白列在末尾, 不猜。只给草稿, 不发送。Turn <material> into <a deliverable> for <audience>, so they can <understand or do something>. Preserve <confirmed facts> and use <tone>. If missing information would change the content, ask at most three questions first. List less important gaps without guessing. Draft only; do not send.
帮我写一条给四位朋友的旧书交换意向消息。暂拟 2026 年 10 月 17 日 15:00–17:00, 社区活动室还没确认;最多带三本旧书, 不用买新书。想请大家周三晚前回复有没有兴趣。语气像朋友聊天, 两小段。先问最多两个会影响消息的问题, 不用做活动方案, 不公开发布也不发送。Draft a message asking four friends about a used-book swap. The provisional date is October 17, 2026, 15:00–17:00, and the community room is not confirmed. Bring at most three used books; no purchase needed. Ask for interest by Wednesday evening. Use two short conversational paragraphs. First ask at most two questions that would change the message. Do not make an event plan, publish, or send it.
这里真正值得追问的是:周三究竟是哪一天, 以及场地未定时是否先征求意向。你可以回答「周三是 10 月 14 日, 只征求意向, 确认场地后另发正式通知」。不用为了凑满两个问题, 再替虚构活动设定主持人、海报风格或座位图。The useful questions are which Wednesday you mean and whether to ask for interest before confirming the room. Answer: “Wednesday is October 14. Ask for interest only; I will send final details after the room is confirmed.” There is no need to fill a question quota with an event host, poster style, or seating plan.如果它的问题没有必要, 你也可以给范围:「这些不影响草稿, 按已提供材料先写, 缺项在后面标出来。」要求先问问题不意味着你要接受一次冗长访谈。If the questions are unnecessary, narrow the scope: “Those do not affect this draft. Use the supplied facts and list gaps afterward.” Asking for clarification does not commit you to a long interview.
— IV
把反馈落在能找到的位置Point to a Specific Change.
假设它写出「诚挚邀请各位莅临已预订的社区活动室, 共同开启知识盛宴」。这是本书构造的失败示例, 不是实际运行截图。它有两类问题:「已预订」改错事实, 其余表达不合你的语气。先纠正事实, 再调整风格, 不要让它为了更亲切把时间也删掉。Suppose it writes, “You are cordially invited to our booked community room for a feast of knowledge.” This is a constructed failure example, not an observed run. “Booked” is a factual error; the rest is a tone mismatch. Fix the fact first, then the style, without losing the time in the process.
提示词Prompt反馈要指出位置和保留项Name the change and what must stay
把 <具体句子或部分> 改成 <期望效果>。原文 <事实> 不能改, <不确定项> 仍保持不确定。只修这些地方, 不添加新承诺。最后列一行本次改动。Change <specific sentence or section> to achieve <desired effect>. Preserve <facts> and keep <uncertain details> uncertain. Revise only these parts and add no new commitments. End with a one-line change summary.
删掉「莅临」「知识盛宴」。开头用「你们下周六有空吗, 想约个旧书交换」。活动室尚未确认, 不能写已预订;日期和时间也继续标暂定。保留每人最多三本、不用买书、10 月 14 日晚前回复, 两小段。末尾另列一句改动说明, 不包含在发送草稿里。Remove the ceremonial language. Open with “Are you free next Saturday? I’m thinking of a used-book swap.” The room is not booked, and the date and time must remain provisional. Keep the three-book maximum, no-purchase rule, and reply deadline of October 14 evening. Use two short paragraphs. Put a separate one-line change note below, outside the message draft.
参考成品可以是:「你们下周六有空吗, 想约个旧书交换。暂定 10 月 17 日 15:00–17:00, 社区活动室还在确认, 先问问大家有没有兴趣。每人最多带三本旧书就好, 不用特意买。方便的话, 10 月 14 日晚前回我一下, 地点确认后我再发正式安排。」这是一份编辑写出的示例答案, 供核对信息, 不要求模型逐字复现。An editorial reference draft is: “Are you free next Saturday? I’m thinking of a used-book swap, provisionally October 17, 15:00–17:00. I’m still checking the community room, so I’m asking about interest first. Bring up to three used books; no need to buy any. Let me know by October 14 evening if you can. I’ll send the final details once the venue is confirmed.” Use it to check the information, not to require identical wording.
— V
什么时候继续改, 什么时候换一条聊天Know When to Continue or Start Fresh.
同一份邀请的语气、长度和事实修订, 留在当前聊天就好。换成一份面向陌生人的公开活动申请, 目标和授权已经不同, 可以开新聊天, 只带入确认后的事实。不要把几十版失败草稿全贴过去, 让它重新猜哪一版有效。Keep tone, length, and fact revisions for the same invitation in the current chat. A public event application for strangers has a different purpose and authority; start a new chat with only the confirmed facts. Do not paste dozens of failed drafts and make it guess which version is current.如果两轮修订仍在反复改错同一个地方, 暂停补提示词。检查原始材料是否互相矛盾, 是否上传了旧版, 是否有一句全局偏好在强迫它写得过分正式。先解决输入冲突, 再考虑换模型;模型升级不会确认你尚未订到的房间。If two revisions keep getting the same detail wrong, pause before adding more instructions. Check for conflicting sources, an old attachment, or a global preference pushing an overly formal style. Resolve the input conflict before changing models; a stronger model cannot confirm a room you have not booked.
— VI
留下有效的反馈, 不收藏一百条咒语Keep Useful Feedback, Not a Prompt Collection.
事实核对:日期、时间、人数、上限和回复期限都来自材料。Verify the date, time, audience, limits, and reply deadline against the source.
语气核对:自己读出声, 删掉不会对朋友说的话。Read it aloud and remove phrases you would not say to your friends.
权限核对:这里只有草稿, 收件人和发送时机仍由自己确认。This is only a draft; you still choose the recipients and send time.
保存一版确认稿和一句有效的反馈, 下次换材料继续用。Save the approved draft and one useful feedback instruction for the next task.
没有 Work、语音或文件上传也能做完整练习, 直接粘贴文字即可。到了限额, 保存已核对的草稿再手动完成;这一章不需要研究模式、联网或多个 agent。你练到的能力是把差距说具体, 它同样适用于下一章的资料包、后面的表格与小工具。You can complete this exercise without Work, voice, or uploads by pasting text. If you hit a limit, save the checked draft and finish manually. It needs no research mode, browsing, or subagents. The skill is describing the gap precisely; it carries over to context packs, spreadsheets, and personal tools.
说清哪里要变,
也说清什么不能变.
Name what should change,
and what must stay.
Aklman Library
— 讨论Discussion
讨论Discussion.
评论区初始化中…Initializing comments…
01 / 01
没有匹配结果No matches.
换个关键词，或按 Esc 回到页面Try another keyword, or press Esc to return
